How Dice Taught Spelling
October 28, 2014John Locke |
John Locke (1632–1704).
Some Thoughts Concerning Education.
Vol. 37, pp. 128-136 of
The Harvard Classics
Locke taught
children by means of games. He tells of a game whereby children were
taught to spell with dice on which the letters of the alphabet were
pasted. This was more than 200 years before modern kindergarten
methods. Today's children would respond to such wise direction as
Locke recommends.
(John Locke died
Oct. 28, 1704.)
[…]
§ 148. When he can talk, ’tis
time he should begin to learn to read. But as to
this, give me leave here to inculcate again, what is very apt to be
forgotten, viz. That great care is to be taken, that
it be never made as a business to him, nor he look on it as a task.
We naturally, as I said, even from our cradles, love liberty, and
have therefore an aversion to many things for no other reason but
because they are enjoin’d us. I have always had a fancy
that learning might be made a play and recreation to
children: and that they might be brought to desire to be taught, if
it were proposed to them as a thing of honour, credit, delight, and
recreation, or as a reward for doing something else; and if they were
never chid or corrected for the neglect of it. That which confirms me
in this opinion is, that amongst the Portuguese, ’tis
so much a fashion and emulation amongst their children, to learn
to read and write, that they cannot hinder them from it:
they will learn it one from another, and are as intent on it, as if
it were forbidden them. I remember that being at a friend’s house,
whose younger son, a child in coats, was not easily brought to
his book (being taught to read at home by his
mother) I advised to try another way, than requiring it of him as his
duty; we therefore, in a discourse on purpose amongst our selves, in
his hearing, but without taking any notice of him, declared, that it
was the privilege and advantage of heirs and elder brothers, to be
scholars; that this made them fine gentlemen, and beloved by every
body: and that for younger brothers, ’twas a favour to admit them
to breeding; to be taught to read and write, was
more than came to their share; they might be ignorant bumpkins and
clowns, if they pleased. This so wrought upon the child, that
afterwards he desired to be taught; would come himself to his mother
to learn, and would not let his maid be quiet till
she heard him his lesson. I doubt not but some way like this might be
taken with other children; and when their tempers are found, some
thoughts be instill’d into them, that might set them upon desiring
of learning, themselves, and make them seek it as
another sort of play or recreation. But then, as I said before, it
must never be imposed as a task, nor made a trouble to them. There
may be dice and play-things, with the letters on them to teach
children the alphabet by playing; and twenty other
ways may be found, suitable to their particular tempers, to make this
kind of learning a sport to them.
§ 149. Thus children may be
cozen’d into a knowledge of the letters; be taught to
read,without perceiving it to be any thing but a sport, and play
themselves into that which others are whipp’d for. Children should
not have any thing like work, or serious, laid on them; neither their
minds, nor bodies will bear it. It injures their healths; and their
being forced and tied down to their books in an age at enmity with
all such restraint, has, I doubt not, been the reason, why a great
many have hated books and learning all their lives after. ’Tis like
a surfeit, that leaves an aversion behind not to be removed.
§ 150. I have therefore thought,
that if play-things were fitted to this purpose, as
they are usually to none, contrivances might be made to teach
children to read, whilst they thought they were only
playing. For example, what if an ivory-ball were
made like that of the royal-oak lottery, with thirty two sides, or
one rather of twenty four or twenty five sides; and upon several of
those sides pasted on an A, upon several others B, on others C, and
on others D? I would have you begin with but these four letters, or
perhaps only two at first; and when he is perfect in them, then add
another; and so on till each side having one letter, there be on it
the whole alphabet. This I would have others play with before him, it
being as good a sort of play to lay a stake who shall first throw an
A or B, as who upon dice shall throw six or seven. This being a play
amongst you, tempt him not to it, lest you make it business; for I
would not have him understand ’tis any thing but a play of older
people, and I doubt not but he will take to it of himself. And that
he may have the more reason to think it is a play, that he is
sometimes in favour admitted to, when the play is done the ball
should be laid up safe out of his reach, that so it may not, by his
having it in his keeping at any time, grow stale to him.
§ 151. To keep up his eagerness
to it, let him think it a game belonging to those above him: and
when, by this means, he knows the letters, by changing them into
syllables, he may learn to read, without knowing how
he did so, and never have any chiding or trouble about it, nor fall
out with books because of the hard usage and vexation they have
caus’d him. Children, if you observe them, take abundance of pains
to learn several games, which, if they should be enjoined them, they
would abhor as a task and business. I know a person of great quality
(more yet to be honoured for his learning and virtue than for his
rank and high place) who by pasting on the six vowels (for in our
language Y is one) on the six sides of a die, and the remaining
eighteen consonants on the sides of three other dice, has made this a
play for his children, that he shall win who, at one cast, throws
most words on these four dice; whereby his eldest son, yet in coats,
has play’d himself into spelling, with
great eagerness, and without once having been chid for it or forced
to it.
§ 152. I have seen little girls
exercise whole hours together and take abundance of pains to be
expert at dibstones as they call it. Whilst I have
been looking on, I have thought it wanted only some good contrivance
to make them employ all that industry about something that might be
more useful to them; and methinks ’tis only the fault and
negligence of elder people that it is not so. Children are much less
apt to be idle than men; and men are to be blamed if some part of
that busy humour be not turned to useful things; which might be made
usually as delightful to them as those they are employed in, if men
would be but half so forward to lead the way, as these little apes
would be to follow. I imagine some wise Portuguese heretofore
began this fashion amongst the children of his country, where I have
been told, as I said, it is impossible to hinder the children from
learning to read and write: and in some parts
of France they teach one another to sing and dance
from the cradle.
§ 153. The letters pasted
upon the sides of the dice, or polygon, were best to be of the size
of those of the folio Bible, to begin with, and none of them capital
letters; when once he can read what is printed in such letters, he
will not long be ignorant of the great ones: and in the beginning he
should not be perplexed with variety. With this die also, you might
have a play just like the royal oak, which would be another variety,
and play for cherries or apples, &c.
§ 154. Besides these, twenty
other plays might be invented depending on letters, which
those who like this way, may easily contrive and get made to this use
if they will. But the four dice above-mention’d I think so easy and
useful, that it will be hard to find any better, and there will be
scarce need of any other.
§ 155. Thus much for learning
to read, which let him never be driven to, nor chid for;
cheat him into it if you can, but make it not a business for him.
’Tis better it be a year later before he can read, than
that he should this way get an aversion to learning. If you have any
contest with him, let it be in matters of moment, of truth, and good
nature; but lay no task on him about A B C. Use your skill to make
his will supple and pliant to reason: teach him to love credit and
commendation; to abhor being thought ill or meanly of, especially by
you and his mother, and then the rest will come all easily. But I
think if you will do that, you must not shackle and tie him up with
rules about indifferent matters, nor rebuke him for every little
fault, or perhaps some that to others would seem great ones; but of
this I have said enough already.
§ 156. When by these gentle ways
he begins to read, some easy pleasant book, suited
to his capacity, should be put into his hands, wherein the
entertainment that he finds might draw him on, and reward his pains
in reading, and yet not such as should fill his head with perfectly
useless trumpery, or lay the principles of vice and folly. To this
purpose, I think Æsop’s Fables the best, which being
stories apt to delight and entertain a child, may yet afford useful
reflections to a grown man; and if his memory retain them all his
life after, he will not repent to find them there, amongst his manly
thoughts and serious business. If his Æsop has pictures in
it, it will entertain him much the better, and encourage him to read,
when it carries the increase of knowledge with it: for such visible
objects children hear talked of in vain and without any satisfaction
whilst they have no ideas of them; those ideas being not to be had
from sounds, but from the things themselves or their pictures. And
therefore I think as soon as he begins to spell, as many pictures of
animals should be got him as can be found, with the printed names to
them, which at the same time will invite him to read, and afford him
matter of enquiry and knowledge. Reynard the Fox is
another book I think may be made use of to the same purpose. And if
those about him will talk to him often about the stories he has read,
and hear him tell them, it will, besides other advantages, add
encouragement and delight to his reading, when he
finds there is some use and pleasure in it. These baits seem wholly
neglected in the ordinary method; and ’tis usually long before
learners find any use or pleasure in reading, which may tempt them to
it, and so take books only for fashionable amusements, or impertinent
troubles, good for nothing.
§ 157. The Lord’s Prayer, the
Creeds, and Ten Commandments, ’tis necessary he should learn
perfectly by heart; but, I think, not by reading them himself in his
primer, but by somebody’s repeating them to him, even before he can
read. But learning by heart, and learning to read, should
not I think be mix’d, and so one made to clog the other. But his
learning to read should be made as little trouble or
business to him as might be.
What other books there are
in English of the kind of those above-mentioned, fit
to engage the liking of children, and tempt them to read, I
do not know: but am apt to think, that children being generally
delivered over to the method of schools, where the fear of the rod is
to inforce, and not any pleasure of the employment to invite them to
learn, this sort of useful books, amongst the number of silly ones
that are of all sorts, have yet had the fate to be neglected; and
nothing that I know has been considered of this kind out of the
ordinary road of the horn-book, primer, psalter, Testament, and
Bible.
§ 158. As for the Bible, which
children are usually employ’d in to exercise and improve their
talent in reading, I think the promiscuous reading
of it through by chapters as they lie in order, is so far from being
of any advantage to children, either for the perfecting their
reading, or principling their religion, that perhaps a
worse could not be found. For what pleasure or encouragement can it
be to a child to exercise himself in reading those parts of a book
where he understands nothing? And how little are the law
of Moses, the song of Solomon, the
prophecies in the Old, and the Epistles and Apocalypse in
the New Testament, suited to a child’s capacity? And though the
history of the Evangelists and the Acts have something
easier, yet, taken altogether, it is very disproportional to the
understanding of childhood. I grant that the principles of religion
are to be drawn from thence, and in the words of the scripture; yet
none should be propos’d to a child, but such as are suited to a
child’s capacity and notions. But ’tis far from this to read
through the whole Bible, and that for reading’s
sake. And what an odd jumble of thoughts must a child have in his
head, if he have any at all, such as he should have concerning
religion, who in his tender age reads all the parts of
the Bible indifferently as the word of God without
any other distinction! I am apt to think, that this in some men has
been the very reason why they never had clear and distinct thoughts
of it all their lifetime.
§ 159. And now I am by chance
fallen on this subject, give me leave to say, that there are some
parts of the Scripture which may be proper to be put
into the hands of a child to engage him to read; such as are the
story of Joseph and his brethren, of David and
Goliath, of David and Jonathan, &c.
and others that he should be made to read for his instruction, as
that, What you would have others do unto you, do you the same
unto them;and such other easy and plain moral rules, which being
fitly chosen, might often be made use of, both for reading and
instruction together; and so often read till they are throughly fixed
in the memory; and then afterwards, as he grows ripe for them, may in
their turns on fit occasions be inculcated as the standing and sacred
rules of his life and actions. But the reading of the whole Scripture
indifferently, is what I think very inconvenient for children, till
after having been made acquainted with the plainest fundamental parts
of it, they have got some kind of general view of what they ought
principally to believe and practise; which yet, I think, they ought
to receive in the very words of the scripture, and not in such as men
prepossess’d by systems and analogies are apt in this case to make
use of and force upon them. Dr. Worthington, to
avoid this, has made a catechism, which has all its answers in the
precise words of the Scripture; a thing of good example, and such a
sound form of words as no Christian can except against as not fit for
his child to learn. Of this, as soon as he can say the Lord’s
Prayer, Creed, the Ten Commandments, by heart, it may be fit for him
to learn a question every day, or every week, as his understanding is
able to receive and his memory to retain them. And when he has this
catechism perfectly by heart, so as readily and roundly to answer to
any question in the whole book, it may be convenient to lodge in his
mind the remaining moral rules scatter’d up and down in the Bible,
as the best exercise of his memory, and that which
may be always a rule to him, ready at hand, in the whole conduct of
his life.
§ 160. When he can
read English well, it will be seasonable to enter
him in writing: and here the first thing should be
taught him is to hold his pen right; and this he
should be perfect in before he should be suffered to put it to paper:
For not only children but any body else that would do any thing well,
should never be put upon too much of it at once, or be set to perfect
themselves in two parts of an action at the same time, if they can
possibly be separated. I think the Italian way of holding the pen
between the thumb and the forefinger alone, may be best; but in this
you may consult some good writing-master, or any other person who
writes well and quick. When he has learn’d to hold his pen right,
in the next place he should learn how to lay his paper, and
place his arm and body to it. These practices being got over, the
way to teach him to write without much trouble, is to get a plate
graved with the characters of such a hand as you like best: but you
must remember to have them a pretty deal bigger than he should
ordinarily write; for every one naturally comes by degrees to write a
less hand than he at first was taught, but never a bigger. Such a
plate being graved, let several sheets of good writing-paper be
printed off with red ink, which he has nothing to do but go over with
a good pen fill’d with black ink, which will quickly bring his hand
to the formation of those characters, being at first shewed where to
begin, and how to form every letter. And when he can do that well, he
must then exercise on fair paper; and so may easily be brought to
write the hand you desire.
§ 161. When he can write well
and quick, I think it may be convenient not only to continue the
exercise of his hand in writing, but also to improve the use of it
farther in drawing; a thing very useful to a gentleman in
several occasions; but especially if he travel, as that which helps a
man often to express, in a few lines well put together, what a whole
sheet of paper in writing would not be able to represent and make
intelligible. How many buildings may a man see, how many machines and
habits meet with, the ideas whereof would be easily retain’d and
communicated by a little skill in drawing; which
being committed to words, are in danger to be lost, or at best but
ill retained in the most exact descriptions? I do not mean that I
would have your son a perfect painter; to be that to
any tolerable degree, will require more time than a young gentleman
can spare from his other improvements of greater moment. But so much
insight into perspective and skill in drawing, as
will enable him to represent tolerably on paper any thing he sees,
except faces, may, I think, be got in a little time, especially if he
have a genius to it; but where that is wanting, unless it be in the
things absolutely necessary, it is better to let him pass them by
quietly, than to vex him about them to no purpose: and therefore in
this, as in all other things not absolutely necessary, the rule
holds, nil invita Minerva.
¶ 1. Short-hand, an
art, as I have been told, known only in England, may
perhaps be thought worth the learning, both for dispatch in what men
write for their own memory, and concealment of what they would not
have lie open to every eye. For he that has once learn’d any sort
of character, may easily vary it to his own private use or fancy, and
with more contraction suit it to the business he would employ it in.
Mr. Rich’s, the best contriv’d of any I have
seen, may, as I think, by one who knows and considers grammar well,
be made much easier and shorter. But for the learning this
compendious way of writing, there will be no need hastily to look out
a master; it will be early enough when any convenient opportunity
offers itself at any time, after his hand is well settled in fair and
quick writing. For boys have but little use of short
hand, and should by no means practise it till they write
perfectly well, and have throughly fixed the habit of doing so.
§ 162. As soon as he can
speak English, ’tis time for him to learn some
other language. This no body doubts of, when French is
propos’d. And the reason is, because people are accustomed to the
right way of teaching that language, which is by talking it into
children in constant conversation, and not by grammatical rules.
The Latin tongue would easily be taught the same
way, if his tutor, being constantly with him, would talk nothing else
to him, and make him answer still in the same language. But
because French is a living language, and to be used
more in speaking, that should be first learned, that the yet pliant
organs of speech might be accustomed to a due formation of those
sounds, and he get the habit of pronouncing French well,
which is the harder to be done the longer it is delay’d.
§ 163. When he can speak and
read French well, which in this method is usually in
a year or two, he should proceed to Latin, which
’tis a wonder parents, when they have had the experiment
in French, should not think ought to be learned the
same way, by talking and reading. Only care is to be taken whilst he
is learning these foreign languages, by speaking and reading nothing
else with his tutor, that he do not forget to read English,which
may be preserved by his mother or some body else hearing him read
some chosen parts of the scripture or other English book
every day.
§ 164. Latin I
look upon as absolutely necessary to a gentleman; and indeed custom,
which prevails over every thing, has made it so much a part of
education, that even those children are whipp’d to it, and made
spend many hours of their precious time uneasily in Latin, who
after they are once gone from school, are never to have more to do
with it as long as they live. Can there be any thing more ridiculous,
than that a father should waste his own money and his son’s time in
setting him to learn the Roman language, when at the
same time he designs him for a trade, wherein he having no use
of Latin, fails not to forget that little which he
brought from school, and which ’tis ten to one he abhors for the
ill usage it procured him? Could it be believed, unless we had every
where amongst us examples of it, that a child should be forced to
learn the rudiments of a language which he is never to use in the
course of life that he is designed to, and neglect all the while the
writing a good hand and casting accounts, which are of great
advantage in all conditions of life, and to most trades indispensably
necessary? But though these qualifications, requisite to trade and
commerce and the business of the world, are seldom or never to be had
at grammar-schools, yet thither not only gentlemen send their younger
sons, intended for trades, but even tradesmen and farmers fail not to
send their children, though they have neither intention nor ability
to make them scholars. If you ask them why they do this, they think
it as strange a question as if you should ask them, why they go to
church. Custom serves for reason, and has, to those who take it for
reason, so consecrated this method, that it is almost religiously
observed by them, and they stick to it, as if their children had
scarce an orthodox education unless they learned Lilly’s grammar.
0 comments