The Most Dashing Figure in Athens
December 11, 2014Alcibiades |
Plutarch (A.D.
46?–c.A.D. 120). Plutarch’s Lives.
Vol. 12, pp. 106-117 of
The Harvard Classics
The handsome
Alcibiades, cunning in politics, bold in war, was the lion of
Athenian society until he violated the secrets of a mysterious
religious cult. Then all outraged Athens united to dash their idol to
the ground.
Alcibiades
ALCIBIADES, as it is
supposed, was anciently descended from Eurysaces, the son of Ajax, by
his father’s side; and by his mother’s side from Alcmæon.
Dinomache, his mother, was the daughter of Megacles. His father,
Clinias, having fitted out a galley at his own expense, gained great
honor in the sea fight at Artemisium, and was afterwards slain in the
battle of Coronea, fighting against the Bœotians. Pericles and
Ariphron, the sons of Xanthippus, nearly related to him, became the
guardians of Alcibiades. It has been said not untruly that the
friendship which Socrates felt for him has much contributed to his
fame; and certain it is, that, though we have no account from any
writer concerning the mother of Nicias or Demosthenes, of Lamachus or
Phormion, of Thrasybulus or Theramenes, notwithstanding these were
all illustrious men of the same period, yet we know even the nurse of
Alcibiades, that her country was Lacedæmon, and her name Amycla; and
that Zopyrus was his teacher and attendant; the one being recorded by
Antisthenes, and the other by Plato.
It is not, perhaps, material to say
any thing of the beauty of Alcibiades, only that it bloomed with him
in all the ages of his life, in his infancy, in his youth, and in his
manhood; and, in the peculiar character becoming to each of these
periods, gave him, in every one of them, a grace and a charm. What
Euripides says, that
“Of all fair things
the autumn, too, is fair,”
is by no means universally
true. But it happened so with Alcibiades, amongst few others, by
reason of his happy constitution and natural vigor of body. It is
said that his lisping, when he spoke, became him well, and gave a
grace and persuasiveness to his rapid speech. Aristophanes takes
notice of it in the verses in which he jests at Theorus; “How like
a colax he is,” says Alcibiades, meaning a corax, 1 on
which it is remarked,
“How very happily he
lisped the truth.”
Archippus also alludes to it in a passage where he
ridicules the son of Alcibiades;
“That people may
believe him like his father,
He walks like one
dissolved in luxury,
Lets his robe trail
behind him on the ground,
Carelessly leans his
head, and in his talk
Affects to lisp.”
His conduct displayed many great
inconsistencies and variations, not unnaturally, in accordance with
the many and wonderful vicissitudes of his fortunes; but among the
many strong passions of his real character, the one most prevailing
of all, was his ambition and desire of superiority, which appears in
several anecdotes told of his sayings whilst he was a child. Once
being hard pressed in wrestling, and fearing to be thrown, he got the
hand of his antagonist to his mouth, and bit it with all his force;
and when the other loosed his hold presently, and said, “You bite,
Alcibiades, like a woman.” “No,” replied he, “like a lion.”
Another time as he played at dice in the street, being then but a
child, a loaded cart came that way, when it was his turn to throw; at
first he called to the driver to stop, because he was to throw in the
way over which the cart was to pass; but the man giving him no
attention and driving on, when the rest of the boys divided and gave
way, Alcibiades threw himself on his face before the cart, and,
stretching himself out, bade the carter pass on now if he would;
which so startled the man, that he put back his horses, while all
that saw it were terrified, and, crying out, ran to assist
Alcibiades. When he began to study, he obeyed all his other masters
fairly well, but refused to learn upon the flute, as a sordid thing,
and not becoming a free citizen; saying, that to play on the lute or
the harp does not in any way disfigure a man’s body or face, but
one is hardly to be known by the most intimate friends, when playing
on the flute. Besides, one who plays on the harp may speak or sing at
the same time; but the use of the flute stops the mouth, intercepts
the voice, and prevents all articulation. “Therefore,” said he,
“let the Theban youths pipe, who do not know how to speak, but we
Athenians, as our ancestors have told us, have Minerva for our
patroness, and Apollo for our protector, one of whom threw away the
flute, and the other stripped the Flute-player of his skin.” Thus,
between raillery and good earnest, Alcibiades kept not only himself
but others from learning, as it presently became the talk of the
young boys, how Alcibiades despised playing on the flute, and
ridiculed those who studied it. In consequence of which, it ceased to
be reckoned amongst the liberal accomplishments, and became
neglected.
It is stated in the invective which
Antiphon wrote against Alcibiades, that once, when he was a boy, he
ran away to the house of Democrates, one of those who made a favorite
of him, and that Ariphron had determined to cause proclamation to be
made for him, had not Pericles diverted him from it, by saying, that
if he were dead, the proclaiming of him could only cause it to be
discovered one day sooner, and if he were safe, it would be a
reproach to him as long as he lived. Antiphon also says, that he
killed one of his own servants with the blow of a staff in Sibyrtius’
wrestling ground. But it is unreasonable to give credit to all that
is objected by an enemy, who makes open profession of his design to
defame him.
It was manifest that the many
well-born persons who were continually seeking his company, and
making their court to him, were attracted and captivated by his
brilliant and extraordinary beauty only. But the affection which
Socrates entertained for him is a great evidence of the natural noble
qualities and good disposition of the boy, which Socrates, indeed,
detected both in and under his personal beauty; and, fearing that his
wealth and station, and the great number both of strangers and
Athenians who flattered and caressed him, might at last corrupt him,
resolved, if possible, to interpose, and preserve so hopeful a plant
from perishing in the flower, before its fruit came to perfection.
For never did fortune surround and enclose a man with so many of
those things which we vulgarly call goods, or so protect him from
every weapon of philosophy, and fence him from every access of free
and searching words, as she did Alcibiades; who, from the beginning,
was exposed to the flatteries of those who sought merely his
gratification, such as might well unnerve him, and indispose him to
listen to any real adviser or instructor. Yet such was the happiness
of his genius, that he discerned Socrates from the rest, and admitted
him, whilst he drove away the wealthy and the noble who made court to
him. And, in a little time, they grew intimate, and Alcibiades,
listening now to language entirely free from every thought of unmanly
fondness and silly displays of affection, finding himself with one
who sought to lay open to him the deficiencies of his mind, and
repress his vain and foolish arrogance,
“Dropped like the
craven cock his conquered wing.”
He esteemed
these endeavors of Socrates as most truly a means which the gods made
use of for the care and preservation of youth, 2 and
began to think meanly of himself, and to admire him; to be pleased
with his kindness, and to stand in awe of his virtue; and, unawares
to himself, there became formed in his mind that reflex image and
reciprocation of Love, or Anteros, 3 that Plato
talks of. It was a matter of general wonder, when people saw him
joining Socrates in his meals and his exercises, living with him in
the same tent, whilst he was reserved and rough to all others who
made their addresses to him, and acted, indeed, with great insolence
to some of them. As in particular to Anytus, the son of Anthemion,
one who was very fond of him, and invited him to an entertainment
which he had prepared for some strangers. Alcibiades refused the
invitation; but, having drunk to excess at his own house with some of
his companions, went thither with them to play some frolic; and,
standing at the door of the room where the guests were enjoying
themselves, and seeing the tables covered with gold and silver cups,
he commanded his servants to take away the one half of them, and
carry them to his own house; and then, disdaining so much as to enter
into the room himself, as soon as he had done this, went away. The
company was indignant, and exclaimed at his rude and insulting
conduct; Anytus, however, said, on the contrary he had shown great
consideration and tenderness in taking only a part, when he might
have taken all.
He behaved in the same manner to all
others who courted him, except only one stranger, who, as the story
is told, having but a small estate, sold it all for about a hundred
staters, which he presented to Alcibiades, and besought him to
accept. Alcibiades, smiling and well pleased at the thing, invited
him to supper, and, after a very kind entertainment, gave him his
gold a gain, requiring him, moreover, not to fail to be present the
next day, when the public revenue was offered to farm, and to outbid
all others. The man would have excused himself, because the contract
was so large, and would cost many talents; but Alcibiades, who had at
that time a private pique against the existing farmers of the
revenue, threatened to have him beaten if he refused. The next
morning, the stranger, coming to the market-place, offered a talent
more than the existing rate; upon which the farmers, enraged and
consulting together, called upon him to name his sureties, concluding
that he could find none. The poor man, being startled at the
proposal, began to retire; but Alcibiades, standing at a distance,
cried out to the magistrates, “Set my name down, he is a friend of
mine; I will be security for him.” When the other bidders heard
this, they perceived that all their contrivance was defeated; for
their way was, with the profits of the second year to pay the rent
for the year preceding; so that, not seeing any other way to
extricate themselves out of the difficulty, they began to entreat the
stranger, and offered him a sum of money. Alcibiades would not suffer
him to accept of less than a talent; but when that was paid down, he
commanded him to relinquish the bargain, having by this device
relieved his necessity.
Though Socrates had many and powerful
rivals, yet the natural good qualities of Alcibiades gave his
affection the mastery. His words overcame him so much, as to draw
tears from his eyes, and to disturb his very soul. Yet sometimes he
would abandon himself to flatterers, when they proposed to him
varieties of pleasure, and would desert Socrates; who, then, would
pursue him, as if he had been a fugitive slave. He despised every one
else, and had no reverence or awe for any but him. Cleanthes, the
philosopher, speaking of one to whom he was attached, says his only
hold on him was by his ears, while his rivals had all the others
offered them; and there is no question that Alcibiades was very
easily caught by pleasures; and the expression used by Thucydides
about the excesses of his habitual course of living gives occasion to
believe so. But those who endeavored to corrupt Alcibiades, took
advantage chiefly of his vanity and ambition, and thrust him on
unseasonably to undertake great enterprises, persuading him, that as
soon as he began to concern himself in public affairs, he would not
only obscure the rest of the generals and statesmen, but outdo the
authority and the reputation which Pericles himself had gained in
Greece. But in the same manner as iron which is softened by the fire
grows hard with the cold, and all its parts are closed again; so, as
often as Socrates observed Alcibiades to be misled by luxury or
pride, he reduced and corrected him by his addresses, and made him
humble and modest, by showing him in how many things he was
deficient, and how very far from perfection in virtue.
When he was past his childhood, he
went once to a grammar-school, and asked the master for one of
Homer’s books; and he making answer that he had nothing of Homer’s,
Alcibiades gave him a blow with his fist, and went away. Another
schoolmaster telling him that he had Homer corrected by himself;
“How?” said Alcibiades, “and do you employ your time in
teaching children to read? You, who are able to amend Homer, may well
undertake to instruct men.” Being once desirous to speak with
Pericles, he went to his house, and was told there that he was not at
leisure, but busied in considering how to give up his accounts to the
Athenians; Alcibiades, as he went away, said, “It were better for
him to consider how he might avoid giving up his accounts at all.”
Whilst he was very young, he was a
soldier in the expedition against Potidæa, where Socrates lodged in
the same tent with him, and stood next him in battle. Once there
happened a sharp skirmish, in which they both behaved with signal
bravery; but Alcibiades receiving a wound, Socrates threw himself
before him to defend him, and beyond any question saved him and his
arms from the enemy, and so in all justice might have challenged the
prize of valor. But the generals appearing eager to adjudge the honor
to Alcibiades, because of his rank, Socrates, who desired to increase
his thirst after glory of a noble kind, was the first to give
evidence for him, and pressed them to crown him, and to decree to him
the complete suit of armor. Afterwards, in the battle of Delium, when
the Athenians were routed and Socrates with a few others was
retreating on foot, Alcibiades, who was on horseback, observing it,
would not pass on, but stayed to shelter him from the danger, and
brought him safe off, though the enemy pressed hard upon them, and
cut off many. But this happened some time after.
He gave a box on the ear to
Hipponicus, the father of Callias, whose birth and wealth made him a
person of great influence and repute. And this he did unprovoked by
any passion or quarrel between them, but only because, in a frolic,
he had agreed with his companions to do it. People were justly
offended at this insolence, when it became known through the city;
but early the next morning, Alcibiades went to his house and knocked
at the door, and, being admitted to him, took off his outer garment,
and, presenting his naked body, desired him to scourge and chastise
him as he pleased. Upon this Hipponicus forgot all his resentment,
and not only pardoned him, but soon after gave him his daughter
Hipparete in marriage. Some say that it was not Hipponicus, but his
son Callias, who gave Hipparete to Alcibiades, together with a
portion of ten talents, and that after, when she had a child,
Alcibiades forced him to give ten talents more, upon pretence that
such was the agreement if she brought him any children. Afterwards,
Callias, for fear of coming to his death by his means, declared, in a
full assembly of the people, that if he should happen to die without
children, the state should inherit his house and all his goods.
Hipparete was a virtuous and dutiful wife, but, at last, growing
impatient of the outrages done to her by her husband’s continual
entertaining of courtesans, as well strangers as Athenians, she
departed from him and retired to her brother’s house. Alcibiades
seemed not at all concerned at this, and lived on still in the same
luxury; but the law requiring that she should deliver to the archon
in person, and not by proxy, the instrument by which she claimed a
divorce, when, in obedience to the law, she presented herself before
him to perform this, Alcibiades came in, caught her up, and carried
her home through the market-place, no one daring to oppose him, nor
to take her from him. She continued with him till her death, which
happened not long after, when Alcibiades had gone to Ephesus. Nor is
this violence to be thought so very enormous or unmanly. For the law,
in making her who desires to be divorced appear in public, seems to
design to give her husband an opportunity of treating with her, and
of endeavoring to retain her.
Alcibiades had a dog which cost him
seventy minas, and was a very large one, and very handsome. His tail,
which was his principal ornament, he caused to be cut off, and his
acquaintance exclaiming at him for it, and telling him that all
Athens was sorry for the dog, and cried out upon him for this action,
he laughed, and said, “Just what I wanted has happened, then. I
wished the Athenians to talk about this, that they might not say
something worse of me.”
It is said that the first time he came
into the assembly was upon occasion of a largess of money which he
made to the people. This was not done by design, but as he passed
along he heard a shout, and inquiring the cause, and having learned
that there was a donative making to the people, he went in amongst
them and gave money also. The multitude thereupon applauding him, and
shouting, he was so transported at it, that he forgot a quail which
he had under his robe, and the bird, being frighted with the noise,
flew off; upon which the people made louder acclamations than before,
and many of them started up to pursue the bird; and one Antiochus, a
pilot, caught it and restored it to him, for which he was ever after
a favorite with Alcibiades.
He had great advantages for entering
public life; his noble birth, his riches, the personal courage he had
shown in divers battles, and the multitude of his friends and
dependents, threw open, so to say, folding doors for his admittance.
But he did not consent to let his power with the people rest on any
thing, rather than on his own gift of eloquence. That he was a master
in the art of speaking, the comic poets bear him witness; and the
most eloquent of public speakers, in his oration against Midias,
allows that Alcibiades, among other perfections, was a most
accomplished orator. If, however, we give credit to Theophrastus, who
of all philosophers was the most curious inquirer, and the greatest
lover of history, we are to understand that Alcibiades had the
highest capacity for inventing, for discerning what was the right
thing to be said for any purpose, and on any occasion; but, aiming
not only at saying what was required, but also at saying it well, in
respect, that is, of words and phrases, when these did not readily
occur, he would often pause in the middle of his discourse for want
of the apt word, and would be silent and stop till he could recollect
himself, and had considered what to say.
His expenses in horses kept for the
public games, and in the number of his chariots, were matter of great
observation; never did any one but he, either private person or king,
send seven chariots to the Olympic games. And to have carried away at
once the first, the second, and the fourth prizes, as Thucydides
says, or the third, as Euripides relates it, outdoes far away every
distinction that ever was known or thought of in that kind. Euripides
celebrates his success in this manner:
“—But
my song to you,
Son of Clinias, is
due.
Victory is noble; how
much more
To do as never Greek
before;
To obtain in the great
chariot race
The first, the second,
and third place;
With easy step
advanced to fame,
To bid the herald
three times claim
The olive for one
victor’s name.”
The emulation displayed by the deputations of
various states, in the presents which they made to him, rendered this
success yet more illustrious. The Ephesians erected a tent for him,
adorned magnificently; the city of Chios furnished him with provender
for his horses and with great numbers of beasts for sacrifice; and
the Lesbians sent him wine and other provisions for the many great
entertainments which he made. Yet in the midst of all this he escaped
not without censure, occasioned either by the ill-nature of his
enemies or by his own misconduct. For it is said, that one Diomedes,
an Athenian, a worthy man and a friend to Alcibiades, passionately
desiring to obtain the victory at the Olympic games, and having heard
much of a chariot which belonged to the state of Argos, where he knew
that Alcibiades had great power and many friends, prevailed with him
to undertake to buy the chariot. Alcibiades did indeed buy it, but
then claimed it for his own, leaving Diomedes to rage at him, and to
call upon the gods and men to bear witness to the injustice. It would
seem there was a suit at law commenced upon this occasion, and there
is yet extant an oration concerning the chariot, written by Isocrates
in defence of the son of Alcibiades. But the plaintiff in this action
is named Tisias, and not Diomedes.
As soon as he began to intermeddle in
the government, which was when he was very young, he quickly lessened
the credit of all who aspired to the confidence of the people, except
Phæax, the son of Erasistratus, and Nicias, the son of Niceratus,
who alone could contest it with him. Nicias was arrived at a mature
age, and was esteemed their first general. Phæax was but a rising
statesman like Alcibiades; he was descended from noble ancestors, but
was his inferior, as in many other things, so, principally in
eloquence. He possessed rather the art of persuading in private
conversation than of debate before the people, and was, as Eupolis
said of him,
“The best of
talkers, and of speakers worst.”
There is extant an oration written by Phæax
against Alcibiades, in which, amongst other things, it is said that
Alcibiades made daily use at his table of many gold and silver
vessels, which belonged to the commonwealth, as if they had been his
own.
There was a certain Hyperbolus, of the
township of Perithœdæ, whom Thucydides also speaks of as a man of
bad character, a general butt for the mockery of all the comic
writers of the time, but quite unconcerned at the worst things they
could say, and, being careless of glory, also insensible of shame; a
temper which some people call boldness and courage, whereas it is
indeed impudence and recklessness. He was liked by nobody, yet the
people made frequent use of him, when they had a mind to disgrace or
calumniate any persons in authority. At this time, the people, by his
persuasions, were ready to proceed to pronounce the sentence of ten
years’ banishment, called ostracism. This they made use of to
humiliate and drive out of the city such citizens as outdid the rest
in credit and power, indulging not so much perhaps their
apprehensions as their jealousies in this way. And when, at this
time, there was no doubt but that the ostracism would fall upon one
of those three, Alcibiades contrived to form a coalition of parties,
and, communicating his project to Nicias, turned the sentence upon
Hyperbolus himself. Others say, that it was not with Nicias, but
Phæax, that he consulted, and, by help of his party, procured the
banishment of Hyperbolus, when he suspected nothing less. For, before
that time, no mean or obscure person had ever fallen under that
punishment, so that Plato, the comic poet, speaking of Hyperbolus,
might well say,
“The man deserved
the fate; deny ’t who can?
Yes, but the fate did
not deserve the man;
Not for the like of
him and his slave-brands
Did Athens put the
sherd into our hands.”
But we have given elsewhere a fuller statement of
what is known to us of the matter.
Alcibiades was not
less disturbed at the distinctions which Nicias gained amongst the
enemies of Athens, than at the honors which the Athenians themselves
paid to him. For though Alcibiades was the proper appointed
person 4 to receive all Lacedæmonians when they
came to Athens, and had taken particular care of those that were made
prisoners at Pylos, yet, after they had obtained the peace and
restitution of the captives, by the procurement chiefly of Nicias,
they paid him very special attentions. And it was commonly said in
Greece, that the war was begun by Pericles, and that Nicias made an
end of it, and the peace was generally called the peace of Nicias.
Alcibiades was extremely annoyed at this, and, being full of envy,
set himself to break the league. First, therefore, observing that the
Argives, as well out of fear as hatred to the Lacedæmonians, sought
for protection against them, he gave them a secret assurance of
alliance with Athens. And communicating, as well in person as by
letters, with the chief advisers of the people there, he encouraged
them not to fear the Lacedæmonians, nor make concessions to them,
but to wait a little, and keep their eyes on the Athenians, who,
already, were all but sorry they had made peace, and would soon give
it up. And, afterwards, when the Lacedæmonians had made a league
with the Bœotians, and had not delivered up Panactum entire, as they
ought to have done by the treaty, but only after first destroying it,
which gave great offence to the people of Athens, Alcibiades laid
hold of that opportunity to exasperate them more highly. He exclaimed
fiercely against Nicias, and accused him of many things, which seemed
probable enough: as that, when he was general, he made no attempt
himself to capture their enemies that were shut up in the isle of
Sphacteria, but, when they were afterwards made prisoners by others,
he procured their release and sent them back to the Lacedæmonians,
only to get favor with them; that he would not make use of his credit
with them, to prevent their entering into this confederacy with the
Bœotians and Corinthians, and yet, on the other side, that he sought
to stand in the way of those Greeks who were inclined to make an
alliance and friendship with Athens, if the Lacedæmonians did not
like it.
It happened, at the very time when
Nicias was by these arts brought into disgrace with the people, that
ambassadors arrived from Lacedæmon, who, at their first coming, said
what seemed very satisfactory, declaring that they had full powers to
arrange all matters in dispute upon fair and equal terms. The council
received their propositions, and the people was to assemble on the
morrow to give them audience. Alcibiades grew very apprehensive of
this, and contrived to gain a secret conference with the ambassadors.
When they were met, he said: “What is it you intend, you men of
Sparta? Can you be ignorant that the council always act with
moderation and respect towards ambassadors, but that the people are
full of ambition and great designs? So that, if you let them know
what full powers your commission gives you, they will urge and press
you to unreasonable conditions. Quit, therefore, this indiscreet
simplicity, if you expect to obtain equal terms from the Athenians,
and would not have things extorted from you contrary to your
inclinations, and begin to treat with the people upon some reasonable
articles, not avowing yourselves plenipotentiaries; and I will be
ready to assist you, out of good-will to the Lacedæmonians.” When
he had said thus, he gave them his oath for the performance of what
he promised, and by this way drew them from Nicias to rely entirely
upon himself, and left them full of admiration of the discernment and
sagacity they had seen in him. The next day, when the people were
assembled and the ambassadors introduced, Alcibiades, with great
apparent courtesy, demanded of them, With what powers they were come?
They made answer that they were not come as plenipotentiaries.
Note
1. This
fashionable Attic lisp, or slovenly articulation, turned the
sound r into l.
Colax, a
flatterer; Corax, a
crow.
Note
2. In allusion to
the philosophical theory which he quoted in the life of Theseus, that
love is a divine provision for the care of the young.
Note 4. The
Proxenus, that is, who in the ancient cities exercised, in a private
station, and as a matter of private magnificence and splendid
hospitality (he being always a citizen of the state in which he
resided) many of the duties of protection now officially committed to
consuls and resident ministers.
0 comments