How Man's Courtship Differs from Animal's
December 16, 2014Edmund Burke |
Edmund Burke
(1729–1797). On the Sublime and Beautiful.
Vol. 24, pp. 37-48 of
The Harvard Classics
Beauty is an
important factor in the attraction between man and woman. It is
knowing beauty that differentiates man from the animals, which only
require that their mates be of the same species.
The Final Cause of
the Difference Between the Passions Belonging to Self-Preservation
and Those Which Regard the Society of the Sexes
THE FINAL cause of the
difference in character between the passions which regard
self-preservation, and those which are directed to the multiplication
of the species, will illustrate the foregoing remarks yet further;
and it is, I imagine, worthy of observation even upon its own
account. As the performance of our duties of every kind depends upon
life, and the performing them with vigour and efficacy depends upon
health, we are very strongly affected with whatever threatens the
destruction of either: but as we are not made to acquiesce in life
and health, the simple enjoyment of them is not attended with any
real pleasure, lest, satisfied with that, we should give ourselves
over to indolence and inaction. On the other hand, the generation of
mankind is a great purpose, and it is requisite that men should be
animated to the pursuit of it by some great incentive. It is
therefore attended with a very high pleasure; but as it is by no
means designed to be our constant business, it is not fit that the
absence of this pleasure should be attended with any considerable
pain. The difference between men and brutes, in this point, seems to
be remarkable. Men are at all times pretty equally disposed to the
pleasures of love, because they are to be guided by reason in the
time and manner of indulging them. Had any great pain arisen from the
want of this satisfaction, reason, I am afraid, would find great
difficulties in the performance of its office. But brutes, who obey
laws, in the execution of which their own reason has but little
share, have their stated seasons; at such times it is not improbable
that the sensation from the want is very troublesome, because the end
must be then answered, or be missed in many, perhaps for ever; as the
inclination returns only with its season.
Of
Beauty
THE PASSION which
belongs to generation, merely as such, is lust only. This is evident
in brutes, whose passions are more unmixed, and which pursue their
purposes more directly than ours. The only distinction they observe
with regard to their mates, is that of sex. It is true, that they
stick severally to their own species in preference to all others. But
this preference, I imagine, does not arise from any sense of beauty
which they find in their species, as Mr. Addison supposes, but from a
law of some other kind, to which they are subject; and this we may
fairly conclude, from their apparent want of choice amongst those
objects to which the barriers of their species have confined them.
But man, who is a creature adapted to a greater variety and intricacy
of relation, connects with the general passion the idea of some
social qualities, which direct and heighten the appetite which he has
in common with all other animals; and as he is not designed like them
to live at large, it is fit that he should have something to create a
preference, and fix his choice; and this in general should be some
sensible quality; as no other can so quickly, so powerfully, or so
surely produce its effect. The object therefore of this mixed
passion, which we call love, is the beauty of the sex. Men are
carried to the sex in general, as it is the sex, and by the common
law of nature; but they are attached to particulars by personal
beauty. I call beauty a social quality; for where women and men, and
not only they, but when other animals give us a sense of joy and
pleasure in beholding them, (and there are many that do so,) they
inspire us with sentiments of tenderness and affection towards their
persons; we like to have them near us, and we enter willingly into a
kind of relation with them, unless we should have strong reasons to
the contrary. But to what end, in many cases, this was designed, I am
unable to discover; for I see no greater reason for a connexion
between man and several animals who are attired in so engaging a
manner, than between him and some others who entirely want this
attraction, or possess it in a far weaker degree. But it is probable,
that Providence did not make even this distinction, but with a view
to some great end; though we cannot perceive distinctly what it is,
as his wisdom is not our wisdom, nor our ways his ways.
Society
and Solitude
THE SECOND branch of
the social passions is that which administers to society in general.
With regard to this, I observe, that society, merely as society,
without any particular heightenings, gives us no positive pleasure in
the enjoyment; but absolute and entire solitude, that is, the total
and perpetual exclusion from all society, is as great a positive pain
as can almost be conceived. Therefore in the balance between the
pleasure of general society and the pain of absolute solitude, pain
is the predominant idea. But the pleasure of any particular social
enjoyment outweighs very considerably the uneasiness caused by the
want of that particular enjoyment; so that the strongest sensations
relative to the habitudes of particular society are sensations of
pleasure. Good company, lively conversation, and the endearments of
friendship, fill the mind with great pleasure; a temporary solitude,
on the other hand, is itself agreeable. This may perhaps prove that
we are creatures designed for contemplation as well as action; since
solitude as well as society has its pleasures; as from the former
observation we may discern, that an entire life of solitude
contradicts the purposes of our being, since death itself is scarcely
an idea of more terror.
Sympathy,
Imitation, and Ambition
UNDER this denomination
of society, the passions are of a complicated kind, and branch out
into a variety of forms, agreeably to that variety of ends they are
to serve in the great chain of society. The three principal links in
this chain are sympathy, imitation, and ambition.
Sympathy
IT is by the first of
these passions that we enter into the concerns of others; that we are
moved as they are moved, and are never suffered to be indifferent
spectators of almost anything which men can do or suffer. For
sympathy must be considered as a sort of substitution, by which we
are put into the place of another man, and affected in many respects
as he is affected; so that this passion may either partake of the
nature of those which regard self-preservation, and turning upon pain
may be a source of the sublime or it may turn upon ideas of pleasure;
and then whatever has been said of the social affections, whether
they regard society in general, or only some particular modes of it,
may be applicable here. It is by this principle chiefly that poetry,
painting, and other affecting arts, transfuse their passions from one
breast to another, and are often capable of grafting a delight on
wretchedness, misery, and death itself. It is a common observation,
that objects which in the reality would shock, are in tragical, and
such like representations, the source of a very high species of
pleasure. This, taken as a fact, has been the cause of much
reasoning. The satisfaction has been commonly attributed, first, to
the comfort we receive in considering that so melancholy a story is
no more than a fiction; and, next, to the contemplation of our own
freedom from the evils which we see represented. I am afraid it is a
practice much too common in inquiries of this nature, to attribute
the cause of feelings which merely arise from the mechanical
structure of our bodies, or from the natural frame and constitution
of our minds, to certain conclusions of the reasoning faculty on the
objects presented to us; for I should imagine, that the influence of
reason in producing our passions is nothing near so extensive as it
is commonly believed.
The
Effects of Sympathy in the Distresses of Others
TO examine this point
concerning the effect of tragedy in a proper manner, we must
previously consider how we are affected by the feelings of our
fellow-creatures in circumstances of real distress. I am convinced we
have a degree of delight, and that no small one, in the real
misfortunes and pains of others; for let the affection be what it
will in appearance, if it does not make us shun such objects, if on
the contrary it induces us to approach them, if it makes us dwell
upon them, in this case I conceive we must have a delight or pleasure
of some species or other in contemplating objects of this kind. Do we
not read the authentic histories of scenes of this nature with as
much pleasure as romances or poems, where the incidents are
fictitious? The prosperity of no empire, nor the grandeur of no king,
can so agreeably affect in the reading, as the ruin of the state of
Macedon, and the distress of its unhappy prince. Such a catastrophe
touches us in history as much as the destruction of Troy does in
fable. Our delight, in cases of this kind, is very greatly
heightened, if the sufferer be some excellent person who sinks under
an unworthy fortune. Scipio and Cato are both virtuous characters;
but we are more deeply affected by the violent death of the one, and
the ruin of the great cause he adhered to, than with the deserved
triumphs and uninterrupted prosperity of the other; for terror is a
passion which always produce delight when it does not press too
closely; and pity is a passion accompanied with pleasure, because it
arises from love and social affection. Whenever we are formed by
nature to any active purpose, the passion which animates us to it is
attended with delight, or a pleasure of some kind, let the
subject-matter be what it will; and as our Creator has designed that
we should be united by the bond of sympathy, he has strengthened that
bond by a proportionable delight; and there most where our sympathy
is most wanted,—in the distresses of others. If this passion was
simply painful, we would shun with the greatest care all persons and
places that could excite such a passion; as some, who are so far gone
in indolence as not to endure any strong impression, actually do. But
the case is widely different with the greater part of mankind; there
is no spectacle we so eagerly pursue, as that of some uncommon and
grievous calamity; so that whether the misfortune is before our eyes,
or whether they are turned back to it in history, it always touches
with delight. This is not an unmixed delight, but blended with no
small uneasiness. The delight we have in such things, hinders us from
shunning scenes of misery; and the pain we feel prompts us to relieve
ourselves in relieving those who suffer; and all this antecedent to
any reasoning, by an instinct that works us to its own purposes
without our concurrence.
Of the
Effects of Tragedy
IT is thus in real
calamities. In imitated distresses the only difference is the
pleasure resulting from the effects of imitation; for it is never so
perfect, but we can perceive it is imitation, and on that principle
are somewhat pleased with it. And indeed in some cases we derive as
much or more pleasure from that source than from the thing itself.
But then I imagine we shall be much mistaken, if we attribute any
considerable part of our satisfaction in tragedy to the consideration
that tragedy is a deceit, and its representations no realities. The
nearer it approaches the reality, and the farther it removes us from
all idea of fiction, the more perfect is its power. But be its power
of what kind it will, it never approaches to what it represents.
Choose a day on which to represent the most sublime and affecting
tragedy we have; appoint the most favourite actors; spare no cost
upon the scenes and decorations, unite the greatest efforts of
poetry, painting, and music; and when you have collected your
audience, just at the moment when their minds are erect with
expectation, let it be reported that a state criminal of high rank is
on the point of being executed in the adjoining square; in a moment
the emptiness of the theatre would demonstrate the comparative
weakness of the imitative arts, and proclaim the triumph of the real
sympathy. I believe that this notion of our having a simple pain in
the reality, yet a delight in the representation, arises from hence,
that we do not sufficiently distinguish what we would by no means
choose to do, from what we should be eager enough to see if it was
once done. The delight in seeing things, which, so far from doing,
our heartiest wishes would be to see redressed. This noble capital,
the pride of England and of Europe, I believe no man is so strangely
wicked as to desire to see destroyed by a conflagration or an
earthquake, though he should be removed himself to the greatest
distance from the danger. But suppose such a fatal accident to have
happened, what numbers from all parts would crowd to behold the
ruins, and amongst many who would have been content never to have
seen London in its glory! Nor is it, either in real or fictitious
distresses, our immunity from them which produces our delight; in my
own mind I can discover nothing like it. I apprehend that this
mistake is owing to a sort of sophism, by which we are frequently
imposed upon; it arises from our not distinguishing between what is
indeed a necessary condition to our doing or suffering anything in
general, and what is the cause of some particular act. If a man kills
me with a sword, it is a necessary condition to this that we should
have been both of us alive before the fact; and yet it would be
absurd to say, that our being both living creatures was the cause of
his crime and of my death. So it is certain, that it is absolutely
necessary my life should be out of any imminent hazard, before I can
take a delight in the sufferings of others, real or imaginary, or
indeed in anything else from any cause whatsoever. But then it is a
sophism to argue from thence, that this immunity is the cause of my
delight either on these or on any occasions. No one can distinguish
such a cause of satisfaction in his own mind, I believe; nay, when we
do not suffer any very acute pain, nor are exposed to any imminent
danger of our lives, we can feel for others, whilst we suffer
ourselves; and often then most when we are softened by affliction; we
see with pity even distresses which we would accept in the place of
our own.
Imitation
THE SECOND passion
belonging to society is imitation, or, if you will, a desire of
imitating, and consequently a pleasure in it. This passion arises
from much the same cause with sympathy. For as sympathy makes us take
a concern in whatever men feel, so this affection prompts us to copy
whatever they do; and consequently we have a pleasure in imitating,
and in whatever belongs to imitation, merely as it is such, without
any intervention of the reasoning faculty, but solely from our
natural constitution, which Providence has framed in such a manner as
to find either pleasure or delight, according to the nature of the
object, in whatever regards the purposes of our being. It is by
imitation far more than by precept, that we learn everything; and
what we learn thus, we acquire not only more effectually, but more
pleasantly. This forms our manners, our opinions, our lives. It is
one of the strongest links of society; it is a species of mutual
compliance, which all men yield to each other, without constraint to
themselves, and which is extremely flattering to all. Herein it is
that painting and many other agreeable arts have laid one of the
principal foundations of their power. And since, by its influence on
our manners and our passions, it is of such great consequence, I
shall here venture to lay down a rule, which may inform us with a
good degree of certainty when we are to attribute the power of the
arts to imitation, or to our pleasure in the skill of the imitator
merely, and when to sympathy, or some other cause in conjunction with
it. When the object represented in poetry or painting is such as we
could have no desire of seeing in the reality, then I may be sure
that its power in poetry or painting is owing to the power of
imitation, and to no cause operating in the thing itself. So it is
with most of the pieces which the painters call still-life. In these
a cottage, a dunghill, the meanest and most ordinary utensils of the
kitchen, are capable of giving us pleasure. But when the object of
the painting or poem is such as we should run to see if real, let it
affect us with what odd sort of sense it will, we may rely upon it,
that the power of the poem or picture is more owing to the nature of
the thing itself than to the mere effect of imitation, or to a
consideration of the skill of the imitator, however excellent.
Aristotle has spoken so much and so boldly upon the force of
imitation in his Poetics, that it makes any further discourse upon
this subject the less necessary.
Ambition
ALTHOUGH imitation is
one of the great instruments used by Providence in bringing our
nature towards its perfection, yet if men gave themselves up to
imitation entirely, and each followed the other, and so on in an
eternal circle, it is easy to see that there never could be any
improvement amongst them. Men must remain as brutes do, the same at
the end that they are at this day, and that they were in the
beginning of the world. To prevent this, God has planted in man a
sense of ambition, and a satisfaction arising from the contemplation
of his excelling his fellows in something deemed valuable amongst
them. It is this passion that drives men to all the ways we see in
use of signalizing themselves, and that tends to make whatever
excites in a man the idea of this distinction so very pleasant. It
has been so strong as to make very miserable men take comfort, that
they were supreme in misery; and certain it is, that, where we cannot
distinguish ourselves by something excellent, we begin to take a
complacency in some singular infirmities, follies, or defects of one
kind or other. It is on this principle that flattery is so prevalent;
for flattery is no more than what raises in a man’s mind an idea of
a preference which he has not. Now, whatever, either on good or upon
bad grounds, tends to raise a man in his own opinion, produces a sort
of swelling and triumph, that is extremely grateful to the human
mind; and this swelling is never more perceived, nor operates with
more force, than when without danger we are conversant with terrible
objects; the mind always claiming to itself some part of the dignity
and importance of the things which it contemplates. Hence proceeds
what Longinus has observed of that glorying sense of inward
greatness, that always fills the reader of such passages in poets and
orators as are sublime; it is what every man must have felt in
himself upon such occasions.
The
Recapitulation
TO draw the whole of
what has been said into a few distinct points:-The passions which
belong to self-preservation turn on pain and danger; they are simply
painful when their causes immediately affect us; they are delightful
when we have an idea of pain and danger, without being actually in
such circumstances; this delight I have not called pleasure, because
it turns on pain, and because it is different enough from any idea of
positive pleasure. Whatever excites this delight, I call sublime. The
passions belonging to self-preservation are the strongest of all the
passions. 1
The second head to
which the passions are referred with relation to their final cause,
is society. There are two sorts of societies. The first is, the
society of sex. The passion belonging to this is called love, and it
contains a mixture of lust; its object is the beauty of women. The
other is the great society with man and all other animals. The
passion subservient to this is called likewise love, but it has no
mixture of lust, and its object is beauty; which is a name I shall
apply to all such qualities in things as induce in us a sense of
affection and tenderness, or some other passion the most nearly
resembling these. The passion of love has its rise in positive
pleasure; it is, like all things which grow out of pleasure, capable
of being mixed with a mode of uneasiness, that is, when an idea of
its object is excited in the mind with an idea at the same time of
having irretrievably lost it. This mixed sense of pleasure I have not
called pain, because it turns upon actual pleasure, and because it
is, both in its cause and in most of its effects, of a nature
altogether different.
Next to the general
passion we have for society, to a choice in which we are directed by
the pleasure we have in the object, the particular passion under this
head called sympathy has the greatest extent. The nature of this
passion is, to put us in the place of another in whatever
circumstance he is in, and to affect us in a like manner; so that
this passion may, as the occasion requires, turn either on pain or
pleasure; but with the modifications mentioned in some cases in sect.
II. As to imitation and preference, nothing more need be said.
The
Conclusion
I BELIEVED that
an attempt to range and methodize some of our most leading passions
would be a good preparative to such an inquiry as we are going to
make in the ensuing discourse. The passions I have mentioned are
almost the only ones which it can be necessary to consider in our
present design; though the variety of the passions is great, and
worthy in every branch of that variety, of an attentive
investigation. The more accurately we search into the human mind, the
stronger traces we everywhere find of his wisdom who made it. If a
discourse on the use of the parts of the body may be considered as an
hymn to the Creator; the use of the passions, which are the organs of
the mind, cannot be barren of praise to him, nor unproductive to
ourselves of that noble and uncommon union of science and admiration,
which a contemplation of the works of infinite wisdom alone can
afford to a rational mind: whilst, referring to him whatever we find
of right or good or fair in ourselves, discovering his strength and
wisdom even in our own weakness and imperfection, honouring them
where we discover them clearly, and adoring their profundity where we
are lost in our search, we may be inquisitive without impertinence,
and elevated without pride; we may be admitted, if I may dare to say
so, into the counsels of the Almighty by a consideration of his
works. The elevation of the mind ought to be the principal end of all
our studies; which if they do not in some measure effect, they are of
very little service to us. But, beside this great purpose, a
consideration of the rationale of our passions seems to me very
necessary for all who would affect them upon solid and sure
principles. It is not enough to know them in general: to affect them
after a delicate manner, or to judge properly of any work designed to
affect them, we should know the exact boundaries of their several
jurisdictions; we should pursue them through all their variety of
operations, and pierce into the inmost, and what might appear
inaccessible, parts of our nature,
Quod
latet arcand non enarrabile fibrâ.
Without
all this it is possible for a man, after a confused manner, sometimes
to satisfy his own mind of the truth of his work; but he can never
have a certain determinate rule to go by, nor can he ever make his
propositions sufficiently clear to others. Poets, and orators, and
painters, and those who cultivate other branches of the liberal arts,
have, without this critical knowledge, succeeded well in their
several provinces, and will succeed: as among artificers there are
many machines made and even invented without any exact knowledge of
the principles they are governed by. It is, I own, not uncommon to be
wrong in theory, and right in practice; and we are happy that it is
so. Men often act right from their feelings, who afterwards reason
but ill on them from principle: but as it is impossible to avoid an
attempt at such reasoning, and equally impossible to prevent its
having some influence on our practice, surely it is worth taking some
pains to have it just, and founded on the basis of sure experience.
We might expect that the artists themselves would have been our
surest guides; but the artists have been too much occupied in the
practice: the philosophers have done little; and what they have done,
was mostly with a view to their own schemes and systems: and as for
those called critics, they have generally sought the rule of the arts
in the wrong place; they sought it among poems, pictures, engravings,
statues, and buildings. But art can never give the rules that make an
art. This is, I believe, the reason why artists in general, and poets
principally, have been confined in so narrow a circle: they have been
rather imitators of one another than of nature; and this with so
faithful an uniformity, and to so remote an antiquity, that it is
hard to say who gave the first model. Critics follow them, and
therefore can do little as guides. I can judge but poorly of
anything, whilst I measure it by no other standard than itself. The
true standard of the arts is in every man’s power; and an easy
observation of the most common, sometimes of the meanest, things in
nature, will give the truest lights, where the greatest sagacity and
industry, that slights such observation, must leave us in the dark,
or, what is worse, amuse and mislead us by false lights. In an
inquiry it is almost everything to be once in a right road. I am
satisfied I have done but little by these observations considered in
themselves; and I never should have taken the pains to digest them,
much less should I have ever ventured to publish them, if I was not
convinced that nothing tends more to the corruption of science than
to suffer it to stagnate. These waters must be troubled, before they
can exert their virtues. A man who works beyond the surface of
things, though he may be wrong himself, yet he clears the way for
others, and may chance to make even his errors subservient to the
cause of truth. In the following parts I shall inquire what things
they are that cause in us the affections of the sublime and
beautiful, as in this I have considered the affections themselves. I
only desire one favour,—that no part of this discourse may be
judged of by itself, and independently of the rest; for I am sensible
I have not disposed my materials to abide the test of a captious
controversy, but of a sober and even forgiving examination, that they
are not armed at all points for battle, but dressed to visit those
who are willing to give a peaceful entrance to truth.
0 comments