He Introduced the Germ
September 28, 2014Louis Pasteur |
Louis Pasteur
(1822–95). Scientific Papers.
Vol. 38, pp. 364-370 of
The Harvard Classics
Proof that germs
cause many contagious diseases was established by Louis Pasteur. His
discoveries revolutionized modern science and lessened the ravages of
every type of disease.
(Louis Pasteur died
Sept. 28, 1895.)
The
Germ Theory and Its Applications to Medicine and Surgery
1 THE SCIENCES gain
by mutual support. When, as the result of my first communications on
the fermentations in 1857–1858, it appeared that the ferments,
properly so-called, are living beings, that the germs of microscopic
organisms abound in the surface of all objects, in the air and in
water; that the theory of spontaneous generation is chimerical; that
wines, beer, vinegar, the blood, urine and all the fluids of the body
undergo none of their usual changes in pure air, both Medicine and
Surgery received fresh stimulation. A French physician, Dr. Davaine,
was fortunate in making the first application of these principles to
Medicine, in 1863.
Our researches of
last year, left the etiology of the putrid disease, or septicemia, in
a much less advanced condition than that of anthrax. We had
demonstrated the probability that septicemia depends upon the
presence and growth of a microscopic body, but the absolute proof of
this important conclusion was not reached. To demonstrate
experimentally that a microscopic organism actually is the cause of a
disease and the agent of contagion, I know no other way, in the
present state of Science, than to subject the microbe (the
new and happy term introduced by M. Sedillot) to the method of
cultivation out of the body. It may be noted that in twelve
successive cultures, each one of only ten cubic centimeters volume,
the original drop will be diluted as if placed in a volume of fluid
equal to the total volume of the earth. It is just this form of test
to which M. Joubert and I subjected the anthrax
bacteridium. 2 Having cultivated it a
great number of times in a sterile fluid, each culture being started
with a minute drop from the preceding, we then demonstrated that the
product of the last culture was capable of further development and of
acting in the animal tissues by producing anthrax with all its
symptoms. Such is—as we believe—the indisputable proof
that anthrax is a bacterial disease.
Our researches
concerning the septic vibrio had not so far been convincing, and it
was to fill up this gap that we resumed our experiments. To this end,
we attempted the cultivation of the septic vibrio from an animal dead
of septicemia. It is worth noting that all of our first experiments
failed, despite the variety of culture media we employed—urine,
beer yeast water, meat water, etc. Our culture media were not
sterile, but we found—most commonly—a microscopic organism
showing no relationship to the septic vibrio, and presenting the
form, common enough elsewhere, of chains of extremely minute
spherical granules possessed of no virulence whatever. 3 This
was an impurity, introduced, unknown to us, at the same time as the
septic vibrio; and the germ undoubtedly passed from the
intestines—always inflamed and distended in septicemic animals—into
the abdominal fluids from which we took our original cultures of the
septic vibrio. If this explanation of the contamination of our
cultures was correct, we ought to find a pure culture of the septic
vibrio in the heart’s blood of an animal recently dead of
septicemia. This was what happened, but a new difficulty presented
itself; all our cultures remained sterile. Furthermore this sterility
was accompanied by loss in the culture media of (the original)
virulence.
It occurred to us that the septic
vibrio might be an obligatory anaërobe and that the sterility of our
inoculated culture fluids might be due to the destruction of the
septic vibrio by the atmospheric oxygen dissolved in the fluids. The
Academy may remember that I have previously demonstrated facts of
this nature in regard to the vibrio of butyric fermentation, which
not only lives without air but is killed by the air.
It was necessary therefore to attempt
to cultivate the septic vibrio either in a vacuum or in the presence
of inert gases—such as carbonic acid.
Results justified our attempt; the
septic vibrio grew easily in a complete vacuum, and no less easily in
the presence of pure carbonic acid.
These results have a necessary
corollary. If a fluid containing septic vibrios be exposed to pure
air, the vibrios should be killed and all virulence should disappear.
This is actually the case. If some drops of septic serum be spread
horizontally in a tube and in a very thin layer, the fluid will
become absolutely harmless in less than half a day, even if at first
it was so virulent as to produce death upon the inoculation of the
smallest portion of a drop.
Furthermore all the vibrios, which
crowded the liquid as motile threads, are destroyed and disappear.
After the action of the air, only fine amorphous granules can be
found, unfit for culture as well as for the transmission of any
disease whatever. It might be said that the air burned the vibrios.
If it is a terrifying thought that
life is at the mercy of the multiplication of these minute bodies, it
is a consoling hope that Science will not always remain powerless
before such enemies, since for example at the very beginning of the
study we find that simple exposure to air is sufficient at times to
destroy them.
But, if oxygen destroys the vibrios,
how can septicemia exist, since atmospheric air is present
everywhere? How can such facts be brought in accord with the germ
theory? How can blood, exposed to air, become septic through the dust
the air contains?
All things are
hidden, obscure and debatable if the cause of the phenomena be
unknown, but everything is clear if this cause be known. What we have
just said is true only of a septic fluid containing adult vibrios, in
active development by fission: conditions are different when the
vibrios are transformed into their germs, 4 that
is into the glistening corpuscles first described and figured in my
studies on silk-worm disease, in dealing with worms dead of the
disease called “flachérie.” Only the adult vibrios disappear,
burn up, and lose their virulence in contact with air: the germ
corpuscles, under these conditions, remain always ready for new
cultures, and for new inoculations.
All this however does not do away with
the difficulty of understanding how septic germs can exist on the
surface of objects, floating in the air and in water.
Where can these corpuscles originate?
Nothing is easier than the production of these germs, in spite of the
presence of air in contact with septic fluids.
If abdominal serous
exudate containing septic vibrios actively growing by fission by
exposed to the air, as we suggested above, but with the precaution of
giving a substantial thickness to the layer, even if only one
centimeter be used, this curious phenomenon will appear in a few
hours. The oxygen is absorbed in the upper layers of the fluid—as
is indicated by the change of color. Here the vibrios are dead and
disappear. In the deeper layers, on the other hand, towards the
bottom of this centimeter of septic fluid we suppose to be under
observation, the vibrios continue to multiply by fission—protected
from the action of oxygen by those that have perished above them:
little by little they pass over to the condition of germ corpuscles
with the gradual disappearance of the thread forms. So that instead
of moving threads of varying length, sometimes greater than the field
of the microscope, there is to be seen only a number of glittering
points, lying free or surrounded by a scarcely perceptible amorphous
mass. 5 Thus is formed, containing the
latent germ life, no longer in danger from the destructive action of
oxygen, thus, I repeat, is formed the septic dust, and we are able to
understand what has before seemed so obscure; we can see how
putrescible fluids can be inoculated by the dust of the air, and how
it is that putrid diseases are permanent in the world.
The Academy will
permit me, before leaving these interesting results, to refer to one
of their main theoretical consequences. At the very beginning of
these researches, for they reveal an entirely new field, what must be
insistently demanded? The absolute proof that there actually exist
transmissible, contagious, infectious diseases of which the cause
lies essentially and solely in the presence of microscopic organisms.
The proof that for at least some diseases, the conception of
spontaneous virulence must be forever abandoned—as well as the idea
of contagion and an infectious element suddenly originating in the
bodies of men or animals and able to originate diseases which
propagate themselves under identical forms: and all of those opinions
fatal to medical progress, which have given rise to the gratuitous
hypotheses of spontaneous generation, of albuminoid ferments, of
hemiorganisms, of archebiosis, and many other conceptions without the
least basis in observation. What is to be sought for in this instance
is the proof that along with our vibrio there does not exist an
independent virulence belonging to the surrounding fluids or solids,
in short that the vibrio is not merely an epiphenomenon of the
disease of which it is the obligatory accompaniment. What then do we
see, in the results that I have just brought out? A septic fluid,
taken at the moment that the vibrios are not yet changed into germs,
loses its virulence completely upon simple exposure to the air, but
preserves this virulence, although exposed to air on the simple
condition of being in a thick layer for some hours. In the first
case, the virulence once lost by exposure to air, the liquid is
incapable of taking it on again upon cultivation: but, in the second
case, it preserves its virulence and can propagate, even after
exposure to air. It is impossible, then, to assert that there is a
separate virulent substance, either fluid or solid, existing, apart
from the adult vibrio or its germ. Nor can it be supposed that there
is a virus which loses its virulence at the moment that the adult
vibrio dies; for such a substance should also lose its virulence when
the vibrios, changed to germs, are exposed to the air. Since the
virulence persists under these conditions it can only be due to the
germ corpuscles—the only thing present. There is only one possible
hypothesis as to the existence of a virus in solution, and that is
that such a substance, which was present in our experiment in
non-fatal amounts, should be continuously furnished by the vibrio
itself, during its growth in the body of the living animal. But it is
of little importance since the hypothesis supposes the forming and
necessary existence of the vibrio. 6
I hasten to touch upon another series
of observations which are even more deserving the attention of the
surgeon than the preceding: I desire to speak of the effects of our
microbe of pus when associated with the septic vibrio. There is
nothing more easy to superpose—as it were-two distinct diseases and
to produce what might be called a septicemic purulent
infection, or a purulent septicemia. Whilst
the microbe-producing pus, when acting alone, gives rise to a thick
pus, white, or sometimes with a yellow or bluish tint, not putrid,
diffused or enclosed by the so-called pyogenic membrane, not
dangerous, especially if localized in cellular tissue, ready, if the
expression may be used for rapid resorption; on the other hand the
smallest abscess produced by this organism when associated with the
septic vibrio takes on a thick gangrenous appearance, putrid,
greenish and infiltrating the softened tissues. In this case the
microbe of pus carried so to speak by the septic vibrio, accompanies
it throughout the body: the highly-inflamed muscular tissues, full of
serous fluid, showing also globules of pus here and there, are like a
kneading of the two organisms.
By a similar
procedure the effects of the anthrax bacteridium and the microbe of
pus may be combined and the two diseases may be superposed, so as to
obtain a purulent anthrax or an anthracoid purulent infection. Care
must be taken not to exaggerate the predominance of the new microbe
over the bacteridium. If the microbe be associated with the latter in
sufficient amount it may crowd it out completely—prevent it from
growing in the body at all. Anthrax does not appear, and the
infection, entirely local, becomes merely an abscess whose cure is
easy. The microbe-producing pus and the septic vibrio (not) 7 being
both anaërobes, as we have demonstrated, it is evident that the
latter will not much disturb its neighbor. Nutrient substances, fluid
or solid, can scarcely be deficient in the tissues from such minute
organisms. But the anthrax bacteridium is exclusively aërobic, and
the proportion of oxygen is far from being equally distributed
throughout the tissues: innumerable conditions can diminish or
exhaust the supply here and there, and since the microbe-producing
pus is also aërobic, it can be understood how, by using a quantity
slightly greater than that of the bacteridium it might easily deprive
the latter of the oxygen necessary for it. But the explanation of the
fact is of little importance: it is certain that under some
conditions the microbe we are speaking of entirely prevents the
development of the bacteridium.
Summarizing—it appears from the
preceding facts that it is possible to produce at will, purulent
infections with no elements of putrescence, putrescent purulent
infections, anthracoid purulent infections, and finally combinations
of these types of lesions varying according to the proportions of the
mixtures of the specific organisms made to act on the living tissues.
These are the
principal facts I have to communicate to the Academy in my name and
in the names of my collaborators, Messrs. Joubert and Chamberland.
Some weeks ago (Session of the 11th of March last) a member of the
Section of Medicine and Surgery, M. Sedillot, after long meditation
on the lessons of a brilliant career, did not hesitate to assert that
the successes as well as the failures of Surgery find a rational
explanation in the principles upon which the germ theory is based,
and that this theory would found a new Surgery—already begun by a
celebrated English surgeon, Dr. Lister, 8 who
was among the first to understand its fertility. With no professional
authority, but with the conviction of a trained experimenter, I
venture here to repeat the words of an eminent confrère.
Note
1. Read before
the French Academy of Sciences, April 29th, 1878. Published in
Comptes rendus de
l’Académie des Sciences, lxxxvi.,
pp. 1037–43.
Note
2. In making the
translation, it seems wiser to adhere to Pasteur’s nomenclature.
Bacillus
anthracis would
be the term employed to-day.—Translator.
Note
3. It is quite
possible that Pasteur was here dealing with certain septicemic
streptococci that are now known to lose their virulence with extreme
rapidity under artificial cultivation.—Translator.
Note
4. By the terms
“germ” and “germ corpuscles,” Pasteur undoubtedly means
“spores,” but the change is not made, in accordance with note 2,
p. 364—Translator.
Note
5. In our note of
July 16th, 1877, it is stated that the septic vibrio is not destroyed
by the oxygen of the air nor by oxygen at high tension, but that
under these conditions it is transformed into germ corpuscles. This
is, however, an incorrect interpretation of facts. The vibrio is
destroyed by oxygen, and it is only where it is in a thick layer that
it is transformed to germ-corpuscles in the presence of oxygen and
that its virulence is preserved.
Note
7. There is
undoubtedly a mistake in the original. Pasteur could not have meant
to say that both bacteria are anaërobes. The word “not” is
introduced to correct the error.—Translator.
Note
8. See
Lord Lister’s paper in the present volume.—Ed.
0 comments