![]() |
Francis Bacon |
Francis Bacon. (1561–1626). Essays,
Civil and Moral.
Vol. 3, pp. 7-19 of The Harvard
Classics
"What is Truth?" asked
Pilate. For an answer Bacon discourses not on human nature as it
should be, but as it is. These shrewd observations on making a life
and a living admit occasional departures from truth.
(Bacon becomes Privy Councilor, July 9,
1616.)
I
Of Truth
One of the fathers, in great severity, called poesy vinum dæmonum [devils’-wine], because it filleth the imagination; and yet it is but with the shadow of a lie. But it is not the lie that passeth through the mind, but the lie that sinketh in and settleth in it, that doth the hurt; such as we spake of before. But howsoever these things are thus in men’s depraved judgments and affections, yet truth, which only doth judge itself, teacheth that the inquiry of truth, which is the love-making or wooing of it, the knowledge of truth, which is the presence of it, and the belief of truth, which is the enjoying of it, is the sovereign good of human nature. The first creature of God, in the works of the days, was the light of the sense; the last was the light of reason; and his sabbath work ever since is the illumination of his Spirit. First he breathed light upon the face of the matter or chaos; then he breathed light into the face of man; and still he breatheth and inspireth light into the face of his chosen. The poet 6 that beautified the sect 7 that was otherwise inferior to the rest, saith yet excellently well: It is a pleasure to stand upon the shore and to see ships tossed upon the sea; a pleasure to stand in the window of a castle and to see a battle and the adventures thereof below: but no pleasure is comparable to the standing upon the vantage ground of truth (a hill not to be commanded, and where the air is always clear and serene), and to see the errors and wanderings and mists and tempests in the vale below; so always that this prospect be with pity, and not with swelling or pride. Certainly, it is heaven upon earth, to have a man’s mind move in charity, rest in providence, and turn upon the poles of truth.
To pass from theological and philosophical truth to the truth of civil business; it will be acknowledged even by those that practise it not, that clear and round dealing is the honor of man’s nature; and that mixture of falsehood is like alloy in coin of gold and silver, which may make the metal work the better, but it embaseth it. For these winding and crooked courses are the goings of the serpent; which goeth basely upon the belly, and not upon the feet. There is no vice that doth so cover a man with shame as to be found false and perfidious. And therefore Montaigne saith prettily, when he inquired the reason why the word of the lie should be such a disgrace and such an odious charge. Saith he, If it be well weighed, to say that a man lieth, is as much to say, as that he is brave towards God and a coward towards men. For a lie faces God, and shrinks from man. Surely the wickedness of falsehood and breach of faith cannot possibly be so highly expressed, as in that it shall be the last peal to call the judgments of God upon the generations of men; it being foretold that when Christ cometh, he shall not find faith upon the earth.
Note 1. Loving.
Note 2. The Skeptics.
Note 3. Latin, windy and rambling.
Note 4. Restricts.
Note 5. Lucian.
Note 6. Lucretius.
Note 7. Epicureans.
II
Of Death
Note 1. Seneca.
Note 2. Mourning garments.
Note 3. Conquers.
Note 4. Anticipates.
Note 5. In Plutarch’s “Lives.”
Note 6. Fastidiousness.
Note 7. Juvenal.
III
Of Unity in Religion
The fruits of unity (next unto the well pleasing of God, which is all in all) are two: the one towards those that are without the church, the other towards those that are within. For the former; it is certain that heresies and schisms are of all others the greatest scandals; yea, more than corruption of manners. For as in the natural body a wound or solution of continuity is worse than a corrupt humor; so in the spiritual. So that nothing doth so much keep men out of the church, and drive men out of the church, as breach of unity. And therefore, whensoever it cometh to that pass, that one saith Ecce in deserto [Lo! in the desert], another saith Ecce in penetralibus 1 [Lo! in the sanctuary]; that is, when some men seek Christ in the conventicles of heretics, and others in an outward face of a church, that voice had need continually to sound in men’s ears, Nolite exire, 1—Go not out. The doctor of the Gentiles 2 (the propriety of whose vocation drew him to have a special care of those without) saith, If an heathen come in, and hear you speak with several tongues, will he not say that you are mad? And certainly it is little better, when atheists and profane persons do hear of so many discordant and contrary opinions in religion; it doth avert them from the church, and maketh them to sit down in the chair of the scorners. It is but a light thing to be vouched in so serious a matter, but yet it expresseth well the deformity. There is a master of scoffing, 3 that in his catalogue of books of a feigned library sets down this title of a book, The Morris-Dance of Heretics. For indeed every sect of them hath a diverse posture or cringe by themselves, which cannot but move derision in worldlings and depraved politics, 4 who are apt to contemn holy things.
As for the fruit towards those that are within; it is peace; which containeth infinite blessings. It establisheth faith; it kindleth charity; the outward peace of the church distilleth into peace of conscience; and it turneth the labors of writing and reading of controversies into treaties 5 of mortification and devotion.
Concerning the bounds of unity; the true placing of them importeth exceedingly. There appear to be two extremes. For to certain zealants 6 all speech of pacification is odious. Is it peace, Jehu? What hast thou to do with peace? turn thee behind me. 7 Peace is not the matter, but following and party. Contrariwise, certain Laodiceans and lukewarm persons think they may accommodate points of religion by middle ways, and taking part of both, and witty 8reconcilements; as if they would make an arbitrament between God and man. Both these extremes are to be avoided; which will be done, if the league of Christians penned by our Savior himself were in the two cross clauses thereof soundly and plainly expounded: He that is not with us is against us; and again, He that is not against us is with us; that is, if the points fundamental and of substance in religion were truly discerned and distinguished from points not merely of faith, but of opinion, order, or good intention. This is a thing may seem to many a matter trivial, 9 and done already. But if it were done less partially, it would be embraced more generally.
Of this I may give only this advice, according to my small model. Men ought to take heed of rending God’s church by two kinds of controversies. The one is, when the matter of the point controverted is too small and light, not worth the heat and strife about it, kindled only by contradiction. For as it is noted by one of the fathers, Christ’s coat indeed had no seam, but the church’s vesture was of divers colors; whereupon he saith, In veste varietas sit, scissura non sit 10 [Let there be variety in the garment, but let there be no division]; they be two things, unity and uniformity. The other is, when the matter of the point controverted is great, but it is driven to an over-great subtilty and obscurity; so that it becometh a thing rather ingenious than substantial. A man that is of judgment and understanding shall sometimes hear ignorant men differ, and know well within himself that those which so differ mean one thing, and yet they themselves would never agree. And if it come so to pass in that distance of judgment which is between man and man, shall we not think that God above, that knows the heart, doth not discern that frail men in some of their contradictions intend the same thing; and accepteth of both? The nature of such controversies is excellently expressed by St. Paul in the warning and precept that he giveth concerning the same, Devita profanas vocum novitates, et oppositiones falsi nominis scientiæ [Avoid profane novelties of terms, and oppositions of science falsely so called]. Men create oppositions which are not; and put them into new terms so fixed, as whereas the meaning ought to govern the term, the term in effect governeth the meaning. There be also two false peaces or unities: the one, when the peace is grounded but upon an implicit 11 ignorance; for all colors will agree in the dark: the other, when it is pieced up upon a direct admission of contraries in fundamental points. For truth and falsehood, in such things, are like the iron and clay in the toes of Nebuchadnezzar’s image; they may cleave, but they will not incorporate.
Concerning the means of procuring unity; men must beware, that in the procuring or muniting 12 of religious unity they do not dissolve and deface the laws of charity and of human society. There be two swords amongst Christians, the spiritual and temporal; and both have their due office and place in the maintenance of religion. But we may not take up the third sword, which is Mahomet’s sword, or like unto it; that is, to propagate religion by wars or by sanguinary persecutions to force consciences; except it be in cases of overt scandal, blasphemy, or intermixture of practice 13 against the state; much less to nourish seditions; to authorize conspiracies and rebellions; to put the sword into the people’s hands; and the like; tending to the subversion of all government, which is the ordinance of God. For this is but to dash the first table 14 against the second; and so to consider men as Christians, as we forget that they are men. Lucretius the poet, when he beheld the act of Agamemnon, that could endure the sacrificing of his own daughter, exclaimed:
“Tantum Religio potuit suadere
malorum”
[To such ill actions Religion could persuade a man]. What would he have said, if he had known of the massacre in France, 15 or the powder treason of England? He would have been seven times more Epicure and atheist than he was. For as the temporal sword is to be drawn with great circumspection in cases of religion; so it is a thing monstrous to put it into the hands of the common people. Let that be left unto the Anabaptists, and other furies. It was great blasphemy when the devil said, I will ascend and be like the Highest; but it is greater blasphemy to personate God, and bring him in saying, I will descend, and be like the prince of darkness:and what is better, to make the cause of religion to descend to the cruel and execrable actions of murthering princes, butchery of people, and subversion of states and governments? Surely this is to bring down the Holy Ghost, instead of the likeness of a dove, in the shape of a vulture or raven; and set out of the bark of a Christian church a flag of a bark of pirates and assassins. Therefore it is most necessary that the church by doctrine and decree, princes by their sword, and all learnings, both Christian and moral, as by their Mercury rod, 16 do damn and send to hell for ever those facts 17 and opinions tending to the support of the same; as hath been already in good part done. Surely in counsels concerning religion, that counsel of the apostle 18 would be prefixed, Ira hominis non implet justitiam Dei [The wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God]. And it was a notable observation of a wise father, and no less ingenuously confessed; that those which held and persuaded pressure of consciences, were commonly interested therein themselves for their own ends.
Note 1. Matthew xxiv. 26.
Note 2. St. Paul.
Note 3. Rabelais.
Note 4. Politicians.
Note 5. Treatises.
Note 6. Zealots.
Note 7. 2 Kings ix. 18, 19.
Note 8. Ingenious.
Note 9. Commonplace.
Note 10. St. Augustine.
Note 11. Entangled.
Note 12. Fortifying.
Note 13. Plotting.
Note 14. Of the commandments. Exodus xxxii. 15, 16; xxxiv. 1–5, 29.
Note 15. On St. Bartholomew’s Day, 1572.
Note 16. With which Mercury summoned souls to the other world.
Note 17. Deeds.
Note 18. St. James.
IV
Of Revenge
REVENGE is a kind of wild justice;
which the more man’s nature runs to, the more ought law to weed it
out. For as for the first wrong, it doth but offend the law; but the
revenge of that wrong putteth the law out of office. Certainly, in
taking revenge, a man is but even with his enemy; but in passing it
over, he is superior; for it is a prince’s part to pardon. And
Solomon, I am sure, saith, It is the glory of a man to pass by an
offence. That which is past is gone, and irrevocable; and wise men
have enough to do with things present and to come; therefore they do
but trifle with themselves, that labor in past matters. There is no
man doth a wrong for the wrong’s sake; but thereby to purchase
himself profit, or pleasure, or honor, or the like. Therefore why
should I be angry with a man for loving himself better than me? And
if any man should do wrong merely out of ill-nature, why, yet it is
but like the thorn or briar, which prick and scratch, because they
can do no other. The most tolerable sort of revenge is for those
wrongs which there is no law to remedy; but then let a man take heed
the revenge be such as there is no law to punish; else a man’s
enemy is still before hand, and it is two for one. Some, when they
take revenge, are desirous the party should know whence it cometh.
This is the more generous. For the delight seemeth to be not so much
in doing the hurt as in making the party repent. But base and crafty
cowards are like the arrow that flieth in the dark. Cosmus, duke of
Florence, had a desperate saying against perfidious or neglecting
friends, as if those wrongs were unpardonable; You shall read (saith
he) that we are commanded to forgive our enemies; but you never read
that we are commanded to forgive our friends. But yet the spirit of
Job was in a better tune: Shall we (saith he) take good at God’s
hands, and not be content to take evil also? And so of friends in a
proportion. This is certain, that a man that studieth revenge keeps
his own wounds green, which otherwise would heal and do well. Public
revenges are for the most part fortunate; as that for the death of
Cæsar; for the death of Pertinax; for the death of Henry the Third
of France; and many more. But in private revenges it is not so. Nay
rather, vindictive persons live the life of witches; who, as they are
mischievous, so end they infortunate.
V
Of Adversity
IT was a high speech of Seneca (after
the manner of the Stoics), that the good things which belong to
prosperity are to be wished; but the good things that belong to
adversity are to be admired. Bona rerum secundarum optabilia;
adversarum mirabilia. Certainly if miracles be the command over
nature, they appear most in adversity. It is yet a higher speech of
his than the other (much too high for a heathen), It is true
greatness to have in one the frailty of a man, and the security of a
God. Vere magnum habere fragilitatem hominis, securitatem Dei. This
would have done better in poesy, where transcendences are more
allowed. And the poets indeed have been busy with it; for it is in
effect the thing which figured in that strange fiction of the ancient
poets, which seemeth not to be without mystery; nay, and to have some
approach to the state of a Christian; that Hercules, when he went to
unbind Prometheus (by whom human nature is represented), sailed the
length of the great ocean in an earthen pot or pitcher; lively
describing Christian resolution, that saileth in the frail bark of
the flesh through the waves of the world. But to speak in a mean. 1
The virtue of prosperity is temperance; the virtue of adversity is
fortitude; which in morals is the more heroical virtue. Prosperity is
the blessing of the Old Testament; adversity is the blessing of the
New; which carrieth the greater benediction, and the clearer
revelation of God’s favor. Yet even in the Old Testament, if you
listen to David’s harp, you shall hear as many hearse-like airs as
carols; and the pencil of the Holy Ghost hath labored more in
describing the afflictions of Job than the felicities of Solomon.
Prosperity is not without many fears and distastes; and adversity is
not without comforts and hopes. We see in needleworks and
embroideries, it is more pleasing to have a lively work upon a sad 2
and solemn ground, than to have a dark and melancholy work upon a
lightsome ground: judge therefore of the pleasure of the heart by the
pleasure of the eye. Certainly virtue is like precious odors, most
fragrant when they are incensed or crushed: for prosperity doth best
discover 3 vice, but adversity doth best discover virtue.
Note
1. In moderation.
Note
2. Dark-colored.
Note
3. Display.
VI
Of Simulation and
Dissimulation
Tacitus saith, Livia sorted well with the arts of her husband and dissimulation of her son;attributing arts or policy to Augustus, and dissimulation to Tiberius. And again, when Mucianus encourageth Vespasian to take arms against Vitellius, he saith, We rise not against the piercing judgment of Augustus, nor the extreme caution or closeness of Tiberius. These properties, of arts or policy and dissimulation or closeness, are indeed habits and faculties several, and to be distinguished. For if a man have that penetration of judgment as he can discern what things are to be laid open, and what to be secreted, and what to be showed at half lights, and to whom and when (which indeed are arts of state and arts of life, as Tacitus well calleth them), to him a habit of dissimulation is a hinderance and a poorness. But if a man cannot obtain to that judgment, then it is left to him generally to be close, and a dissembler. For where a man cannot choose or vary in particulars, there it is good to take the safest and wariest way in general; like the going softly by one that cannot well see. Certainly the ablest men that ever were have had all an openness and frankness of dealing; and a name of certainty and veracity; but then they were like horses well managed; 1 for they could tell passing well when to stop or turn; and at such times when they thought the case indeed required dissimulation, if then they used it, it came to pass that the former opinion spread abroad of their good faith and clearness of dealing made them almost invisible.
There be three degrees of this hiding and veiling of a man’s self. The first, closeness, reservation, and secrecy; when a man leaveth himself without observation, or without hold to be taken, what he is. The second, dissimulation, in the negative; when a man lets fall signs and arguments, that he is not that he is. And the third, simulation in the affirmative; when a man industriously and expressly feigns and pretends to be that he is not.
For the first of these, secrecy; it is indeed the virtue of a confessor. And assuredly the secret man heareth many confessions. For who will open himself to a blab or a babbler? But if a man be thought secret, it inviteth discovery; as the more close air sucketh in the more open; and as in confession the revealing is not for worldly use, but for the ease of a man’s heart, so secret men come to the knowledge of many things in that kind; while men rather discharge their minds than impart their minds. In few words, mysteries are due to secrecy. Besides (to say truth) nakedness is uncomely, as well in mind as body; and it addeth no small reverence to men’s manners and actions, if they be not altogether open. As for talkers and futile 2 persons, they are commonly vain and credulous withal. For he that talketh what he knoweth, will also talk what he knoweth not. Therefore set it down, that an habit of secrecy is both politic and moral. And in this part it is good that a man’s face give his tongue leave to speak. For the discovery of a man’s self by the tracts 3 of his countenance is a great weakness and betraying; by how much it is many times more marked and believed than a man’s words.
For the second, which is dissimulation; it followeth many times upon secrecy by a necessity; so that he that will be secret must be a dissembler in some degree. For men are too cunning to suffer a man to keep an indifferent carriage between both, and to be secret, without swaying the balance on either side. They will so beset a man with questions, and draw him on, and pick it out of him, that, without an absurd silence, he must show an inclination one way; or if he do not, they will gather as much by his silence as by his speech. As for equivocations, or oraculous speeches, they cannot hold out long. So that no man can be secret, except he give himself a little scope of dissimulation; which is, as it were, but the skirts or train of secrecy.
But for the third degree, which is simulation and false profession; that I hold more culpable, and less politic; except it be in great and rare matters. And therefore a general custom of simulation (which is this last degree) is a vice, rising either of a natural falseness of fearfulness, or of a mind that hath some main faults, which because a man must needs disguise, it maketh him practise simulation in other things, lest his hand should be out of ure. 4
The great advantages of simulation and dissimulation are three. First, to lay asleep opposition, and to surprise. For where a man’s intentions are published, it is an alarum to call up all that are against them. The second is, to reserve to a man’s self a fair retreat. For if a man engage himself by a manifest declaration, he must go through or take a fall. The third is, the better to discover the mind of another. For to him that opens himself men will hardly show themselves adverse; but will (fair 5) let him go on, and turn their freedom of speech to freedom of thought. And therefore it is a good shrewd proverb of the Spaniard, Tell a lie and find a troth. As if there were no way of discovery but by simulation. There be also three disadvantages, to set it even. The first, that simulation and dissimulation commonly carry with them a show of fearfulness, which in any business doth spoil the feathers of round 6 flying up to the mark. The second, that it puzzleth and perplexeth the conceits of many, that perhaps would otherwise co-operate with him; and makes a man walk almost alone to his own ends. The third and greatest is, that it depriveth a man of one of the most principal instruments for action; which is trust and belief. The best composition and temperature 7 is to have openness in fame and opinion; secrecy in habit; dissimulation in seasonable use; and a power to feign, if there be no remedy.
Note 1. Trained.
Note 2. Babbling.
Note 3. Lines, expression.
Note 4. Practise.
Note 5. Rather.
Note 6. Straight.
Note 7. Combination of qualities, temperament.
Comments
Post a Comment